[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit t
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes) |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:33:35 -0400 |
Léo Le Bouter <lle-bout@zaclys.net> writes:
> On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 13:40 -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> This commit was digitally signed and pushed to the 'wip-gnome' branch
>> by
>> Raghav, but it's also "Signed-off-by: Léo Le Bouter", so I'm not sure
>> who bears primary responsibility for this one.
>
> It seems you are more focused and spend more time sending accusations
> here than collaboratively working to improve GNU Guix. I don't feel
> like that's something great to do at all.
I feel an obligation to protect our users, and among other things that
means calling attention to Guix committers that are doing things like
pushing commits with misleading commit logs (which evade proper review)
and pushing "cosmetic changes" that remove security fixes.
I've given evidence to back up these claims, evidence that anyone who
cares to look in our git repository can plainly see. If you believe my
conclusions are erroneous, please make your case.
Mark
--
Support Richard Stallman against the vicious misinformation campaign
against him and the FSF. See <https://stallmansupport.org> for more.
- Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes, (continued)
- Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes, Raghav Gururajan, 2021/04/21
- Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes, Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/21
- Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes, Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/22
- Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/22
- Re: Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Léo Le Bouter, 2021/04/22
- Re: Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Ricardo Wurmus, 2021/04/22
- Re: Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes),
Mark H Weaver <=
- Re: Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Ludovic Courtès, 2021/04/26
- Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/28
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Leo Famulari, 2021/04/28
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Pjotr Prins, 2021/04/28
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Joshua Branson, 2021/04/29
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Léo Le Bouter, 2021/04/29
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Matias Jose Seco Baccanelli, 2021/04/29
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), aviva, 2021/04/29
- Re: Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Ludovic Courtès, 2021/04/22
- Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes, Raghav Gururajan, 2021/04/22