[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is the standard path for documentation?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: What is the standard path for documentation? |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Jun 2021 15:31:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Paul,
"Paul A. Patience" <paul@apatience.com> skribis:
> What is the standard place to put documentation?
> The license files are automatically installed to the
> share/doc/NAME-VERSION directory
> (see install-licence-files in gnu-build-system.scm),
> but it seems like various packages install the actual
> documentation to share/doc/NAME.
Right, share/doc/NAME appears to be more common (perhaps we should fix
‘install-licence-files’).
> Also, is it alright for files in the documentation directories
> to refer to various other directories in the store?
> Deal.II installs the attached files as documentation, but
> I thought I saw the source of a Guix package make an attempt
> to strip build directory information from one of its output
> files.
Reference to the build directories are not great but OK.
However, the two log files you mention refer to build-time tools. As a
result, if you install those, the total size reported by ‘guix size
dealii’ will be noticeably bigger because the set of “references”
(run-time dependencies) would not include things like GCC and so on,
even though they are not actually used at run time.
Thus, I would not install these two files, especially since they seem to
be redundant with Guix-supported provenance tracking.
HTH!
Ludo’.