Re: LAPACK vs. OpenBLAS

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi Eric,

Eric Brown <ecbrown@ericcbrown.com> skribis:

> There are scenarios where reference BLAS is more stable and/or
> reproducible than optimized BLAS libraries.  Sometimes its lack of
> knowledge of OpenBLAS and/or a numerical issue.
>
> (cf. GNU R's discussion of which BLAS to use.)

Do you have a pointer to that discussion?

Are there other cases where netlib BLAS is considered more appropriate
than OpenBLAS because it’s more numerically stable?

Thanks for your feedback,
Ludo’.