[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: Rethinking propagated inputs? |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Sep 2021 00:34:57 +0200 |
On Thu, 09 Sep 2021 at 00:12, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> skribis:
>> (define glib
>> (package
>> (name "glib")
>> (outputs '("out" ; everything
>> "bin" ; glib-mkenums ... depends on Python
>> "build")) ; glib-2.0.pc
>> (propagated-inputs
>> `(("pcre" ,pcre #:propagate-for-output "build") ; in the
>> Requires.private field of glib-2.0.pc
>> ("libffi" ,libffi #:propagate-for-output "build") ; ditto, for
>> gobject-2.0.pc
>> ;; etc.
>> ))
>> (native-inputs '()) ; not relevant to this e-ail
>> ...))
>
> Good’ol ‘ROADMAP’ file has a half-baked proposal along these lines.
I think you mean the ’TODO’ file:
<https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/TODO#n37>
Cheers,
simon
- Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?, (continued)
- Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?, 宋文武, 2021/09/07
- Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?, Maxim Cournoyer, 2021/09/06
- Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2021/09/06
- Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?, Sarah Morgensen, 2021/09/07
- Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2021/09/08
- Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?, iskarian, 2021/09/08
Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/09/08
Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?,
zimoun <=
Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?, zimoun, 2021/09/06