[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging the “binary” NPM importer?
From: |
pinoaffe |
Subject: |
Re: Merging the “binary” NPM importer? |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Sep 2021 01:13:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.4.15; emacs 27.2 |
Hi!
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> We’ll have to check what maintainers think, but I’ve come to think that
> we could include it in Guix proper, while of course properly documenting
> its shortcomings.
>
> We would probably not include packages made with it in Guix proper, but
> it can still be useful to users who want a way to manage free JS code
> with Guix. And on top of that, it already exists. :-)
Having it in Guix proper would be great!
I do however think that quite a couple of improvements would be
necessary before this can be merged
kind regards,
pinoaffe
- Adding extra package importers, pinoaffe, 2021/09/19
- Re: Adding extra package importers, Maxime Devos, 2021/09/19
- Merging the “binary” NPM importer?, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/09/23
- Re: Merging the “binary” NPM importer?,
pinoaffe <=
- Re: Merging the “binary” NPM importer?, Jelle Licht, 2021/09/26
- Re: Merging the “binary” NPM importer?, pinoaffe, 2021/09/26
- Re: Merging the “binary” NPM importer?, Philip McGrath, 2021/09/26
- Re: Merging the “binary” NPM importer?, pinoaffe, 2021/09/27
- Re: Merging the “binary” NPM importer?, Katherine Cox-Buday, 2021/09/27
- Re: Merging the “binary” NPM importer?, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/09/28
Re: Merging the “binary” NPM importer?, Christine Lemmer-Webber, 2021/09/24