[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hardened toolchain
From: |
Aurora |
Subject: |
Re: Hardened toolchain |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:53:13 -0400 |
Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e@gmail.com> writes:
> Aurora <rind38@disroot.org> writes:
>> There are multicore processors made in the last decade or two that
>> aren't affected by speculative execution vulnerabilities?
>
> They are vulnerable to them, but not necessarily affected by them.
> Consider a computer not networked to the internet and only running
> trusted workloads (e.g. scientific HPC, etc.). This is why acknowledging that
> everyone has a different threat model is important.
>
> I hope this helps to clarify.
It does help, that makes sense, thanks.
- Re: Hardened toolchain, kiasoc5, 2022/04/14
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Hardened toolchain, jbranso, 2022/04/15
- Re: Hardened toolchain, Zhu Zihao, 2022/04/15
- Re: Hardened toolchain, raingloom, 2022/04/15
- Re: Hardened toolchain, Katherine Cox-Buday, 2022/04/26
- Re: Hardened toolchain, Aurora, 2022/04/28
- Re: Hardened toolchain, Katherine Cox-Buday, 2022/04/28
- Re: Hardened toolchain,
Aurora <=
- Re: Hardened toolchain, Vagrant Cascadian, 2022/04/28
- Re: Hardened toolchain, Aurora, 2022/04/28