[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
«Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Termin
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
«Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology» |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Jun 2022 12:51:23 +0200 |
Hi,
On Sun, 12 Jun 2022 at 15:10, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> wrote:
> It's ‘reproducible’ in the trivial sense that you can ‘reproduce’ a
> scientific paper by putting it a photocopier. That way, you can
> reproduce the results, but you cannot confirm whether these results
> were correct.
More details for the interested reader here [1].
1: <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5778115/>
Cheers,
simon
- Re: On commit access, patch review, and remaining healthy, (continued)
- Re: On commit access, patch review, and remaining healthy, zimoun, 2022/06/14
- Re: On commit access, patch review, and remaining healthy, Maxim Cournoyer, 2022/06/14
- Re: On commit access, patch review, and remaining healthy, Arun Isaac, 2022/06/15
- Re: On commit access, patch review, and remaining healthy, Arun Isaac, 2022/06/13
Re: On commit access, patch review, and remaining healthy, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/06/12
- Re: On commit access, patch review, and remaining healthy, Giovanni Biscuolo, 2022/06/12
- Re: On commit access, patch review, and remaining healthy, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/12
- Re: On commit access, patch review, and remaining healthy, Giovanni Biscuolo, 2022/06/13
- Re: On commit access, patch review, and remaining healthy, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/13
- Re: On commit access, patch review, and remaining healthy, Giovanni Biscuolo, 2022/06/13
«Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology»,
zimoun <=
Re: On commit access, patch review, and remaining healthy, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/06/12