[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0
From: |
Maxime Devos |
Subject: |
Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0 |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:14:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
Felix Lechner schreef op vr 17-06-2022 om 13:11 [-0700]:
> > If you are already in California, [...], but if you don't and
> > simply
> > Apple needs to appeal to international
> > law enforcement or your country in particular, whichever is easier.
>
> I generally think of license violations as civil matters. With some
> small exceptions, law enforcement focuses on criminal cases.
I thought that copyright violations were a criminal matter in the US,
but after some cursory searching, it appears to be more complicated.
Apparently there's both a civil part and a criminal part, where
apparently the criminal part is for some cases of willful copyright
infringement.
> As a resident of Northern California, I personally like the local
> legal environment. You would have to talk to a lawyer to see if the
> Ninth Circuit (copyright claims are Federal) would honor the clause
> about ignoring the UN Convention after considering the relative
> strength of the parties, as a matter of sound public policy.
I don't know California but sounds nice. Also I guess I'd need to do
the same to see if $local_country would do such a thing too.
> Perhaps the weighing of those factors played a role in why Apple's
> attempt to stipulate a venue did not render the license unfree.
Maybe, yes, I dunno.
Greetings,
Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Philip McGrath, 2022/06/16
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/06/16
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Philip McGrath, 2022/06/16
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, zimoun, 2022/06/17
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/17
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/06/17
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/17
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Felix Lechner, 2022/06/17
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0,
Maxime Devos <=
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, zimoun, 2022/06/17
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Philip McGrath, 2022/06/17
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/17
Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/17
Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/17