[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-lilypond-mode should we?
|
From: |
Tobias Platen |
|
Subject: |
Re: emacs-lilypond-mode should we? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:54:31 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
On Mon, 2022-07-11 at 16:29 +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 02:10:36AM -0500, jgart wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Should we package this mode separately from lilypond as emacs-
> > lilypond-mode?
> >
> > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=tree;f=elisp;h=dc4d450a9f98433d04ac87057571ab58f98497c5;hb=HEAD
> >
> > all best,
> >
> > jgart
>
> I think it would be best to package it separately, and I'm pretty
> sure
> that's already what is suggested. The two packages I have installed
> that
> happen to have .el files installed also don't have them compiled to
> .elc
> files. Best to keep it separate so it's done with all the automation
> of
> the emacs-build-system.
>
I agree, soon I will use that one when I compose vocasynth songs using
lilypond, since I use emacs and a lilypond addon for festival, which I
have replaced with a more modern sinsy. Soon I will package that one
too.