Re: What's needed to get things building for i586-gnu (the hurd) post core-updates?

[jbranso]

May 5, 2023 11:02 AM, "Christopher Baines" <mail@cbaines.net> wrote:

> Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz> writes:
> 
>> Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> writes:
>>> I think the use of coreutils-boot0 in the source for gcc-boot0 is a
>>> problematic change introduced in core-updates [2], at least
>>> coreutils-boot0 fails to build.
>> 
>> Just to recap, as you mentioned on IRC, the coreutils configure phase
>> seems to miss hurd.h, even though it is included in the bootstrap glibc.
>> It might be due to the coreutils upgrade, since I don't see what else
>> could've changed this derivation. I don't have a childhurd at the
>> moment (because a cross-compiled Hurd fails to run), so I can't really
>> test native compilation as above :(
> 
> I think the first bit to look at here is not that coreutils-boot0 is
> failing, but why it's started being used, because I'm not even sure
> about that.

Fun fact of the day, the Debian GNU/Hurd is starting to build 64-bit
packages:

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2023-05/msg00073.html