guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: branch master updated: gnu: eudev: Use new package style.


From: Liliana Marie Prikler
Subject: Re: branch master updated: gnu: eudev: Use new package style.
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 21:25:35 +0200
User-agent: Evolution 3.46.4

Am Montag, dem 29.05.2023 um 19:28 +0100 schrieb Christopher Baines:
> 
> guix-commits@gnu.org writes:
> 
> > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
> > 
> > lilyp pushed a commit to branch master
> > in repository guix.
> > 
> > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this
> > push:
> >      new 7ff003bcbf gnu: eudev: Use new package style.
> > 7ff003bcbf is described below
> > 
> > commit 7ff003bcbf388677c7c85b1709c58f41f84b9947
> > Author: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>
> > AuthorDate: Sun May 28 16:28:20 2023 -0700
> > 
> >     gnu: eudev: Use new package style.
> >     
> >     * gnu/packages/linux.scm (eudev)[arguments]: Convert to list of
> > G-Expressions.
> >     [native-inputs]: Drop labels.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Liliana Marie Prikler
> > <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  gnu/packages/linux.scm | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > ------------
> >  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> 
> These changes do look to affect the derivation for eudev, and eudev
> also has too many dependents to update on the master branch.
> 
> → guix refresh -l eudev
> Building the following 1913 packages would ensure 4138 dependent
> packages are rebuilt: ...
Should I revert it?  Even with the mass rebuild, my intuition was that
it'd be okay since it's no functional change and core-updates was
dropped in favour of teams (with no particular team being responsible
for udev afaik).

Cheers



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]