[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
collection of “guix pull“ bug reports
From: |
Simon Tournier |
Subject: |
collection of “guix pull“ bug reports |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Nov 2023 09:32:10 +0100 |
Hi,
>>> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/62830
>>> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/63451
>>> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/63830
>>> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/64489
>>> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/64659
>>> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/64753
>>> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/64963
More are reported…
>>> Any idea about what could be unexpected or what needs some love?
>>
>> I haven't checked the above links, but I think something that would help
>> in this regard is better handling of network issues. E.g, don't print a
>> backtrace on the first connection failure; retry maybe 3 times then
>> print a helpful error mentioning the network appears unreliable.
>
> IMHO, this collection raises two questions:
>
> 1. Why does it happen? To say it explicitly, I am almost sure that
> something is not smoothly working as expected on server side. For
> instance, I had ‘guix pull’ troubles with a machine and I am doubtful
> that this machine has network issue (this machine is using the fast
> network link of my Univ. employer :-))
>
> 2. What could be done on client side for reducing the annoyance? I
> agree that substitute failures should be better handled. For example,
> retry 3 times then display an error message. Etc.
Well, most of the time, the error is transient so it is hard to debug.
On client side (#2), well I have ideas how to fake a faulty network on
my end. What could be done on server side?
Cheers,
simon
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- collection of “guix pull“ bug reports,
Simon Tournier <=