[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Separating test inputs?
From: |
Felix Lechner |
Subject: |
Separating test inputs? |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Jan 2024 21:31:27 -0800 |
Hi,
A better test infrastructure in Guix would probably be good, but is not
ready yet. Would it make sense, however, to split out those inputs only
needed for testing?
Such a step would probably make bootstrapping new architectures a lot
easier. It would also reduce the dependency graph in Guix, since tests
are not needed to either build or use a package.
In Debian, test prerequisites are annotated awkwardly with <!nocheck> in
the build prerequisites. (I think Guix calls them native-inputs.) You
can see some of Debian's funny notations here [1] and here. [2]
This is a proposal for 'test-inputs'. Any thoughts?
Kind regards
Felix
[1]
https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/libm/libmouse-perl/control-2.5.10-1
[2] https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/l/lintian/control-2.116.3
- Separating test inputs?,
Felix Lechner <=