[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion
From: |
Steve George |
Subject: |
Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Feb 2024 22:50:36 +0000 |
Hi Hartmut,
Apologies, my reply-to went a bit mad and I sent you empty emails :-(
You said:
> The current mail-based workflow is too complicated for new and
> occasional committers. This is the main reason I gave up reviewing patches.
>
In the case of *reviewing patches* can you give some examples of:
1. Some patches from others you reviewed?
2. The steps you went through to undertake that review?
If for example, you started to review a simple update to a package how do you
aproach it?
It would be great to hear directly from someone doing 'reviewing' on the
specifics. Apologies, if this is going over old ground.
Thanks,
Steve
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, (continued)
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Steve George, 2024/02/05
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Steve George, 2024/02/05
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Steve George, 2024/02/05
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Steve George, 2024/02/05
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Steve George, 2024/02/05
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Steve George, 2024/02/05
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Steve George, 2024/02/05
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Steve George, 2024/02/05
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Steve George, 2024/02/05
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Steve George, 2024/02/05
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion,
Steve George <=
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Edouard Klein, 2024/02/06
Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Simon Tournier, 2024/02/15