[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#25879: [PATCH] gnu: Add LLVM and CLANG 3.9.1.
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#25879: [PATCH] gnu: Add LLVM and CLANG 3.9.1. |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Mar 2017 18:19:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Roel!
Roel Janssen <address@hidden> skribis:
>>From aaef88b2ab14fd0c631ae7fec296fd899ebf42dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roel Janssen <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 11:57:34 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add LLVM and CLANG 3.9.1.
>
> * gnu/packages/llvm.scm (llvm-3.9.1): New variable.
> * gnu/packages/llvm.scm (clang-3.9.1): New variable.
> * gnu/packages/llvm.scm (clang-runtime-3.9.1): New variable.
I agree with Catonano here, no need to repeat the file name. :-)
> +(define-public llvm-3.9.1
> + (package (inherit llvm)
> + (name "llvm")
> + (version "3.9.1")
> + (source
> + (origin
> + (method url-fetch)
> + (uri (string-append "http://llvm.org/releases/"
> + version "/llvm-" version ".src.tar.xz"))
> + (sha256
> + (base32
> + "1vi9sf7rx1q04wj479rsvxayb6z740iaz3qniwp266fgp5a07n8z"))))))
> +
> +(define-public clang-runtime-3.9.1
> + (clang-runtime-from-llvm
> + llvm-3.9.1
> + "16gc2gdmp5c800qvydrdhsp0bzb97s8wrakl6i8a4lgslnqnf2fk"))
> +
> +(define-public clang-3.9.1
> + (clang-from-llvm llvm-3.9.1 clang-runtime-3.9.1
> + "0qsyyb40iwifhhlx9a3drf8z6ni6zwyk3bvh0kx2gs6yjsxwxi76"
> + #:patches '()))
Could you add a comment explaining why we need to keep this version
specifically?
Other than that LGTM.
Thanks!
Ludo’.