|
From: | Thomas Danckaert |
Subject: | bug#26312: [PATCH] gnu: Add cifs-utils. |
Date: | Sun, 02 Apr 2017 18:14:19 +0200 (CEST) |
From: Marius Bakke <address@hidden> Subject: Re: bug#26312: [PATCH] gnu: Add cifs-utils. Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 13:35:54 +0200
I had a short discussion with Ludo over this in #26256[0]. The consensusis that the "license" field should communicate the terms of the end result, i.e. what the user installs.
Thanks for the clarification! In that case I agree that GPL3+ is what's applicable.
I've seen a number of discussions about licensing. Maybe I can add a “License” subsection in the manual's “Packaging Guidelines”?
Thomas
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |