[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#26391: [PATCH 0/1] Patching getcap and which in torsocks
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
bug#26391: [PATCH 0/1] Patching getcap and which in torsocks |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Apr 2017 15:08:08 +0000 |
Eric Bavier transcribed 0.8K bytes:
> This patches references to the 'getcap' and 'which' programs in 'torsocks'
> so that users that don't have either of those packages installed in their
> profiles do not see confusing output about them missing. Usually torsocks
> will still function in that case, but it's probably better to have them
> available.
>
> I've so far done this sort of thing for several packages with shell scripts,
> and each time I'm convinced that this method is better than declaring the
> inputs in propagated-inputs. But I think I'd feel more sure of myself if we
> had a short "Packaging shell scripts" section in the manual that outlined
> best-practices-of-the-moment. Would that be useful?
>
> Eric Bavier (1):
> gnu: torsocks: Patch references to 'getcap' and 'which'.
>
> gnu/packages/tor.scm | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> --
> 2.12.2
>
>
I have not run the patch, but the code looks good to me.
The "dependencies" are not obvious, so your proposed change is okay.