[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#27657] Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: graphviz: Update to 2.40.1.)
From: |
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice |
Subject: |
[bug#27657] Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: graphviz: Update to 2.40.1.) |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:02:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
Arun,
On 11/07/17 23:34, Arun Isaac wrote:
> Both appear to be the same tarball. I don't know why they have two
> copies on the server. Should we change the source URL of our package?
In general, dual-directory schemes like this — anything involving
‘current’ vs. ‘archive’ — often suggest that the project intends to
periodically prune the former.
For example, they might keep only the latest release of a series and
move the rest to an ‘archive’ directory. Therefore, it's common to use
the latter directly, or hedge our bets by trying both.
The ‘sudo’ package is a good example of this.
In this case, as you've no doubt already noticed, both directories are
identical. I'd say: before changing anything, ask upstream why they do
this and which URI we should prefer.
Kind regards,
T G-R
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[bug#27657] [PATCH] gnu: graphviz: Update to 2.40.1., Arun Isaac, 2017/07/12