[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#27690] [PATCH] build: Allow mounting of entire disks.
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
[bug#27690] [PATCH] build: Allow mounting of entire disks. |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:28:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Danny Milosavljevic <address@hidden> skribis:
> * gnu/build/file-systems.scm (disk-partitions): Also return entire drives.
In the subject line, please write “file-systems:” instead of “build:”
(the latter is for Makefile and configury.)
> --- a/gnu/build/file-systems.scm
> +++ b/gnu/build/file-systems.scm
> @@ -377,11 +377,14 @@ not valid header was found."
> (string-ref str (- (string-length str) 1)))
>
> (define (partition? name major minor)
> - ;; Select device names that end in a digit, like libblkid's 'probe_all'
> - ;; function does. Checking for "/sys/dev/block/MAJOR:MINOR/partition"
> - ;; doesn't work for partitions coming from mapped devices.
> - (and (char-set-contains? char-set:digit (last-character name))
> - (> major 2))) ;ignore RAM disks and floppy
> disks
> + ;; grub-mkrescue does some funny things for EFI support which
> + ;; makes it a lot more difficult than one would expect to support
> + ;; booting an ISO-9660 image from an USB flash drive.
> + ;; For example there's a buggy (too small) hidden partition in it
> + ;; which Linux rightfully refuses to mount.
> + ;; In any case, partition tables are supposed to be optional so
> + ;; here we allow checking entire disks for file systems, too.
> + (> major 2)) ;ignore RAM disks and floppy disks
I think you can remove ‘last-character’ and keep the comment about
/sys/dev/block.
Have you tested that this doesn’t cause any problems on actual hardware,
like matching things that should really be skipped, and then causing
failures down the road in label/UUID code?
Also, it seems that we’d be departing from what libblkid is doing, per
the comment above. To me that raises a flag, though if we really need
it that’s fine of course.
Thoughts? :-)
Thanks,
Ludo’.