[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#27870] tor: Remove 'expensive-hardening' option.
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
[bug#27870] tor: Remove 'expensive-hardening' option. |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Jul 2017 17:31:19 +0000 |
Since no one has vetoed against this, here is my patch to
improve tor again. I had no issues in the 9+ days since
I've been using it like this (didn't expect any) and only
improvement of the current situation with tor.
Patch appended.
> ng0 writes:
>
> > I noticed this before the contribution entered master, so this message
> > is not really a news.
> >
> > To quote myself from earlier today:
> >
> > <ng0> I think we should revert one piece of the tor hardened build.. 3
> > hours
> > uptime: 684.3 MiB + 753.0 KiB = 685.1 MiB tor
> >
> > Comparison: my Chromium with 55 tabs open uses 2.2GB.
> >
> > Private + Shared = RAM used Program
> > …
> > 12.4 MiB + 1.1 MiB = 13.4 MiB vim
> > 15.5 MiB + 959.0 KiB = 16.4 MiB Xorg
> > 17.3 MiB + 5.6 MiB = 22.9 MiB guix substitute
> > 22.8 MiB + 1.3 MiB = 24.1 MiB shepherd
> > 26.7 MiB + 551.5 KiB = 27.3 MiB emacs-25.2
> > 131.1 MiB + 6.2 MiB = 137.3 MiB .guix-real
> > 732.7 MiB + 932.0 KiB = 733.6 MiB tor
> > …
> > uptime: 6:24h
> >
> > Now I wouldn't consider tor to be problematic when this would be the
> > default for tor. But it isn't, and --enable-expensive-hardening is an
> > experimental function which is not enabled by default from upstream (as
> > all our recently added config options for tor (not sure right now if all
> > are experimental, but they are not standard).
> >
> > Comparison, Debian running for a very long time (months) and using the
> > same config:
> >
> > 40.6 MiB + 486.0 KiB = 41.1 MiB tor
> >
> >
> > I'm convinced that removing --enable-expensive-hardening will improve
> > the situation, I have watched an VM with tor without this config switch.
> > Whoever needs or wants this switch can make use of the easy way to
> > create custom packages in Guix.
> >
> > If someone else can confirm my observations, I'll prepare an patch.
>
> The top(1) command tells me that tor is taking up just short of a
> gigabyte of RAM. I haven't tried disabling the --enable-expensive-hardening
> flag, yet.
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org
0001-gnu-tor-Remove-enable-expensive-hardening-option.patch
Description: Text document
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [bug#27870] tor: Remove 'expensive-hardening' option.,
ng0 <=