[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#28288] [PATCH 2/2] WIP
From: |
Christopher Baines |
Subject: |
[bug#28288] [PATCH 2/2] WIP |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Aug 2017 23:56:47 +0100 |
On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:38:00 +0200
Danny Milosavljevic <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 07:31:13 +0100
> Christopher Baines <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Currently, I get the following error when running this test.
> >
> > registering closures...
> > error: initialising database schema: disk I/O error
> > ERROR: In procedure scm-error:
> > ERROR: failed to register store items "/xchg/system"
> >
> >
> > I also need the patch from
> > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=28273 otherwise I
> > can't even run the test.
> >
> > Danny, I guess you have been looking at installing from an ISO
> > image as well, as I spotted you added it to the release target.
> > Have you been able to successfully use it yet?
>
> Does that mean with the wip-installer-2 branch?
I've just been testing with the master branch, and with the changes I
sent to this bug. Are there any changes on the wip-installer-2 that are
not solely related to the installer (which if I understand correctly is
something more complicated than running guix system init).
> Otherwise in master I always tested it using gnu/system/install.scm
> until it has booted up successfully, which it did.
>
> I've asked about the installation part before but there was no
> response.
Ok, that's good to know. I would guess it's pretty close now, great
work on moving the ISO stuff forward!
> > When attempting to use it initially, I encountered a problem where a
> > glibc in the store was partially deleted. /var/guix/db/db.sqlite
> > also initially didn't exist, which the WIP patch here attempts to
> > address.
>
> Hmm, do you have logs of the release creation process? Maybe xorriso
> complained?
From talking to Ludo at the GHM, I think there is some extra steps
needed to make installing from the ISO possible, but I don't yet
understand this. I'll CC Ludo, as he might be able to explain better.
pgp9CEV1wKUcN.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature