|
From: | julien lepiller |
Subject: | [bug#28663] [PATCH 01/22] guix: ant-build-system: Add main-class support. |
Date: | Tue, 03 Oct 2017 11:50:18 +0200 |
User-agent: | Roundcube Webmail/1.3.1 |
Le 2017-10-03 11:09, Ricardo Wurmus a écrit :
address@hidden writes:From: Julien Lepiller <address@hidden> * guix/build-system/ant.scm: New #:main-class argument * guix/build/ant-build-system.scm: Generate a manifest file with additional properties. ---[…]+ (target (@ (name "manifest")) + (mkdir (@ (dir "${manifest.dir}"))) + (echo (@ (file "${manifest.file}") + (message ,(string-append + (if main-class + (string-append+ "Main-Class: " main-class + "${line.separator}")+ "") + ""))))) + (target (@ (name "compile")) (mkdir (@ (dir "${classes.dir}"))) (javac (@ (includeantruntime "false") @@ -97,10 +112,11 @@(include (@ (name "**/*Test.java" )))))))(target (@ (name "jar") - (depends "compile")) + (depends "compile, manifest")) (mkdir (@ (dir "${jar.dir}"))) (exec (@ (executable "jar"))- (arg (@ (line ,(string-append "-cf ${jar.dir}/" jar-name + (arg (@ (line ,(string-append "-cmf ${manifest.file} " + "${jar.dir}/" jar-name " -C ${classes.dir} ."))))))This is good, thank you. Could you please also document this in the manual in section “Build Systems”?
Is something like this OK? I will divide that paragraph in the two commits of course.
+The @code{#:main-class} parameter can be used with the minimal ant build +file to specify the main class of the resulting jar. This makes the jar +file executable. The @code{#:test-include} parameter can be used to specify the +list of junit tests to run. It defaults to @code{(list "**/*Test.java")}. +The @code{#:test-exclude} can be used to disable some tests. It defaults to address@hidden(list "**/Abstract*.java")}, because abstract classes cannot be run as
+tests.
One question remains, though: will this affect the timestamps inside thejar file? If so, can we reset the timestamp to ensure reproducibility?
I think it's taken care of by the strip-jar-timestamps phase, but I will check.
I also have a side-question:Some of the maven packages use three or four different generators, and some dependencies (such as java-eclipse-sisu-plexus) have a lot of runtime dependencies that are not discovered by java. The issue here is that including java-eclipse-sisu-plexus in the inputs field of a package is enough to build it, but not to run it. We could use propagated-inputs for that, as in the python world, but it doesn't feel right. This issue is also present for test dependencies where I would get a lot of runtime error because java cannot find a dependency of a dependency.
I see that there is a Class-Path entry that can be added to the MANIFEST.MF file, and that could be a way java could find the dependencies of a package.
The jar file is actually a zip archive. Would the grafter be able to graft it?
Do you know whether Class-Path is transitive?Is there a way to programmatically filter inputs from native- and propagated- inputs? Or should we ask the packager to give a list of dependencies in a build argument, effectively duplicating some code?
I had this issue with the antlr tools too, but I found a solution: I added a shell wrapper that uses the correct classpath, but it only works because antlr is not a library.
Thank for your review and sorry for the unexpected questions.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |