[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#28004] Chromium
From: |
Marius Bakke |
Subject: |
[bug#28004] Chromium |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Feb 2018 18:38:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.26 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Björn Höfling <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Marius,
>
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:06:57 +0100
> Marius Bakke <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> ng0 <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > Marius Bakke transcribed 2.1K bytes:
>> >> Mike Gerwitz <address@hidden> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 20:01:34 +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> >> >> If there are no objections, expect to see this in 'master' in
>> >> >> 1-2 weeks.
>> >> >
>> >> > I want to express gratitude for your hard work on this---given
>> >> > that IceCat does not contain many of the FF devtool updates,
>> >> > Chromium is very desirable for web development. It's also
>> >> > needed for certain Node.js tools, like node-inspector.
>> >> >
>> >> > So, thank you!
>> >>
>> >> Thank *you* for the kind words! :-)
>> >>
>> >> Here is the latest iteration of this patch. New in this version:
>> >>
>> >> * Chromium 64 (duh).
>> >> * The 'delete-bundled-software' phase has been moved to a snippet,
>> >> shaving ~100MiB (~22%) off the compressed tarball size (and
>> >> drastically reduces (de)compression time).
>> >> * The New Tab page does not show any thumbnails for new profiles.
>> >
>> > I think you forgot to attach the patches :)
>>
>> Derp. I realized that and just used `git send-email`[0], but have
>> attached it here for convenience since the debbugs web UI doesn't
>> allow easy download of a raw message.
>>
>> [0] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?msg=131;bug=28004#131
>>
>
>
> This looks like a lot of work. Thank you!
>
> I quickly tried to apply and build the patch and have two first remarks:
>
> The file says:
>
> ;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017, 2018 Marius Bakke <address@hidden>
>
> I haven't followed history, have you worked on this since 2016?
Yeah, I started this shortly after going full-GuixSD in October 2016.
But I didn't submit it until now because I didn't think it met Guix's
standards (and still think it's questionable due to privacy concerns).
> One patch has a hash-mismatch:
>
> Starting download of
> /gnu/store/q8hlws48cjfcmz6i40jrnxn3kp750gy4-chromium-icu.patch
> From
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-chromium/pkg-chromium.git/plain/debian/patches/system/icu.patch?id=debian/64.0.3282.119-2...
> icu.patch 2KiB 1.8MiB/s 00:00 [####################]
> 100.0%
> output path `/gnu/store/q8hlws48cjfcmz6i40jrnxn3kp750gy4-chromium-icu.patch'
> should have sha256 hash
> `0kf77d8lyma3w0xpgfv2k0c741zp6ii08gzllfja6d5s59c15ylv', instead has
> `19r0bpv2hapzq5m0m7rlz1dwn3h2ijgkilb2hmhw56qvwpbw0b59'
> @ build-failed
> /gnu/store/cqdllqn8ig5wnjn0yqvnh4vlzsvnpzv6-chromium-icu.patch.drv - 1 output
> path `/gnu/store/q8hlws48cjfcmz6i40jrnxn3kp750gy4-chromium-icu.patch' should
> have sha256 hash `0kf77d8lyma3w0xpgfv2k0c741zp6ii08gzllfja6d5s59c15ylv',
> instead has `19r0bpv2hapzq5m0m7rlz1dwn3h2ijgkilb2hmhw56qvwpbw0b59'
> cannot build derivation
> `/gnu/store/vacxbwsprcp52vp6q975450zi091dak2-chromium-64.0.3282.186.tar.xz.drv':
> 1 dependencies couldn't be built
> @ build-started
> /gnu/store/7q53inn1v32b5fain0h0wcrliclf0ff1-libvpx+experimental-1.7.0.drv -
> x86_64-linux
> /var/log/guix/drvs/7q//53inn1v32b5fain0h0wcrliclf0ff1-libvpx+experimental-1.7.0.drv.bz2
> cannot build derivation
> `/gnu/store/5qv7anaaqk4576pma9mhcsz1nhrx1n01-chromium-64.0.3282.186.drv': 1
> dependencies couldn't be built
> guix build: error: build failed: build of
> `/gnu/store/5qv7anaaqk4576pma9mhcsz1nhrx1n01-chromium-64.0.3282.186.drv'
> failed
>
> I looked into the file and it looks reasonable, like a patch-file. It has no
> download errors.
>
> It starts like this:
>
> description: backwards compatibility for older versions of icu
> author: Michael Gilbert <address@hidden>
>
> --- a/v8/src/runtime/runtime-intl.cc
> +++ b/v8/src/runtime/runtime-intl.cc
> @@ -627,7 +627,11 @@ RUNTIME_FUNCTION(Runtime_PluralRulesSele
>
> ...
>
> Can you check this file again?
Whoops, indeed. I had an older patch in my store and apparently forgot
to update the hash.
The correct hash for %chromium-system-icu.patch is:
19r0bpv2hapzq5m0m7rlz1dwn3h2ijgkilb2hmhw56qvwpbw0b59
Thanks for letting me know! I'll send an updated patch later, with some
other minor improvements.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[bug#28004] Chromium, Mike Gerwitz, 2018/02/26