[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#30647] [PATCH] guix build: Support '--remote-log-file=PACKAGE'.
From: |
Oleg Pykhalov |
Subject: |
[bug#30647] [PATCH] guix build: Support '--remote-log-file=PACKAGE'. |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Mar 2018 18:40:50 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>>> ‘--remote-log-file’ allows to get a URL for a build log file on a
>>>> substitute
>>>> server regardless is it built locally. ‘--log-file’ returns always local
>>>> build log file.
>>>
>>> What did you think of having ‘--log-file’ transparently fall back to
>>> searching for log files on substitute servers?
>
> To put it differently: what do you dislike about the current behavior?
Suppose package build failed locally. I want to receive a log from a
remote server. I could do it manually by:
1. Removing local failed log.
2. ‘wget’, but I need to know a URL.
3. Hydra web interface, which is slow (especially multiple packages).
> No no: keep the current behavior, but print something when we’re looking
> for a remote log file (currently it silently checks whether the remote
> log file is available.)
Still not clear to me. If ‘guix --log-file’ checks for a remote log
file, then it gets a valid URL to a remote build log file for free,
doesn't it?
>> I don't think mixing those in one output is good, because for example
>> you cannot do like:
>>
>> diff -u <(guix build --log-file hello) <(guix build --remote-log-file hello)
>
> I see. I guess I’ve never wanted that, or rather, when I do, I
> explicitly wget the remote log file. :-)
Could I ask What's your workflow for ‘wget’?
> So I guess I’m unconvinced about the need for a separate
> ‘--remote-log-file’ option.
>
> What do people think? Ricardo?
Maybe CC him? Or is it a bad etiquette for a mailing list, because he
is subscribed?
>> As a better approach in addition to ‘--no-substitutes’, maybe we could
>> implement ‘--only-substitutes’ (as I remember Nix has it)? Such flag
>> will return a remote log file and will avoid building packages locally.
>
> That could be an option, but that’s much more work (not limited to log
> file handling.)
Yes, but benefits (especially avoid building packages locally) are
worth.
If you don't agree with the patch, I'll not complain and will try to
work on ‘--only-substitutes’. :-)
Oleg.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature