[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
[bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:09:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 |
> I have searched a little bit in my store... Looks like its not the case.
> After all it seems to me that this is the purpose of a source snippet.
My understanding is that snippets are mostly meant as a Lispy way to replace
patches.
But hey, it's all Scheme code in the end, should it be executed before or after
does not make much of a difference.
> Yes. With the abstraction we could only import the function and do not
> need the emacs-build-system imported in modules that have nothing to do
> with emacs otherwise.
But you'll have to import the module where the abstraction is defined ;)
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename, Tim Gesthuizen, 2018/12/03
- [bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/12/13
- [bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/12/14
- [bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename, Tim Gesthuizen, 2018/12/14
- [bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/12/14
- [bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename, Tim Gesthuizen, 2018/12/14
- [bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename,
Pierre Neidhardt <=
- [bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename, Tim Gesthuizen, 2018/12/14
- [bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename, Tim Gesthuizen, 2018/12/19
- [bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/12/19