[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#34154] [PATCH] /etc/os-release
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
[bug#34154] [PATCH] /etc/os-release |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:59:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> skribis:
> I found a man page online from freedesktop.org¹, it seems that it's been
> aborbed by systemd at some point.
OK.
> It looks like some build systems can try to get information from it
> during building if they have distro-specific things to do.
That is precisely the kind of bad practice that I’d rather not
encourage. :-)
> The only software that I know of that we have that would use it would
> be inxi. guix environment --ad-hoc inxi-minimal -- inxi -S "Distro:
> Unknown" isn't that big of a deal, and we could just submit a patch
> upstream if we really wanted it fixed.
It has other problems:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix environment -C --ad-hoc inxi-minimal -- inxi -S
sh: tty: command not found
Can't exec "ps": No such file or directory at
/gnu/store/4x20lf98vwj357zcj6il8zka2d8mr9h0-inxi-minimal-3.0.20-1/bin/.inxi-real
line 17535.
Use of uninitialized value in split at
/gnu/store/4x20lf98vwj357zcj6il8zka2d8mr9h0-inxi-minimal-3.0.20-1/bin/.inxi-real
line 17535.
Can't exec "ps": No such file or directory at
/gnu/store/4x20lf98vwj357zcj6il8zka2d8mr9h0-inxi-minimal-3.0.20-1/bin/.inxi-real
line 3052.
Use of uninitialized value in split at
/gnu/store/4x20lf98vwj357zcj6il8zka2d8mr9h0-inxi-minimal-3.0.20-1/bin/.inxi-real
line 3052.
Can't exec "ps": No such file or directory at
/gnu/store/4x20lf98vwj357zcj6il8zka2d8mr9h0-inxi-minimal-3.0.20-1/bin/.inxi-real
line 17535.
Use of uninitialized value in split at
/gnu/store/4x20lf98vwj357zcj6il8zka2d8mr9h0-inxi-minimal-3.0.20-1/bin/.inxi-real
line 17535.
12System: 12Host ribbon 12Kernel 4.20.3-gnu x86_64 12bits 64 12Console N/A
12Distro unknown
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> That said, I'm happy enough to plop it in my own os-config and drop the
> patch.
OK, let’s take that route.
That said, I’m clearly opinionated ;-), but if that turns out to be a
hindrance to many, we can revisit this issue.
Thanks,
Ludo’.