[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#37693] Seahorse build
From: |
Miguel |
Subject: |
[bug#37693] Seahorse build |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Oct 2019 18:59:39 +0200 |
Hi,
El 21 oct. 2019 18:22, Leo Prikler <address@hidden> escribió:
>
> Am Montag, den 21.10.2019, 17:25 +0200 schrieb Miguel Arruga Vivas:
>>> > > > > @@ -2244,8 +2248,10 @@ engineering.")
> > > > > (native-inputs
> > > > > `(("intltool" ,intltool)
> > > > > ("glib:bin" ,glib "bin")
> > > > > + ("gtk+:bin" ,gtk+ "bin")
> > > > > ("itstool" ,itstool)
> > > > > ("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)
> > > > > + ("vala" ,vala)
> > > >
> > > > Likewise, these changes were necessary, right?
> > >
> > > Indeed. After changing the build system, I've repeatedly run "guix
> > > build seahorse" and added the inputs that the build system
> > > complained
> > > about until the build succeeded. ("gtk+:bin" is necessary due to
> > > the
> > > icon cache IIRC).
> >
> > I've solved this modifying the %standard-phases, as in other packages
> > from gnome.
> I'm not sure, whether that is the right approach. Seahorse used glib-
> or-gtk-build-system before, so I would assume the generation of those
> caches is expected.
The icon.cache is generated later by a profile hook, as it must include all
icons from the user-installed packages and not only seahorse ones. That's the
reason behind its removal during installation phase.
> > I don't have the last one because it is fixed with 3.30.1.1. Also, I
> > have an extra python that could be a leftover.
> Would you mind checking, whether your patch works with gtk+:bin added
> and without python? If so, I'd find it preferable to mine.
I cannot test the python removal right now, but I'll answer as soon I can build
it.
Best regards,
Miguel