[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#37978] [PATCH 1/2] guix: new command "guix time-machine"
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
[bug#37978] [PATCH 1/2] guix: new command "guix time-machine" |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Nov 2019 13:00:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Konrad,
Thanks for the updated patch!
Konrad Hinsen <address@hidden> skribis:
> * guix/scripts/time-machine.scm: New file.
> * Makefile.am: (MODULES): Add it.
> * guix/scripts/pull.scm: Export function channel-list.
> * guix/inferior.scm: New function cached-guix-filetree-for-channels.
> * doc/guix.texi: Document "guix time-machine"
[...]
> +(define* (cached-guix-filetree-for-channels channels
> + #:key
> + (cache-directory
> (%inferior-cache-directory))
> + (ttl (* 3600 24 30)))
> + "Return a directory containing a guix filetree defined by CHANNELS, a list
> of channels.
> +The directory is a subdirectory of CACHE-DIRECTORY, where entries can be
> reclaimed after TTL seconds.
> +This procedure opens a new connection to the build daemon."
> (with-store store
It’s the same as in v1, right?
How about (1) calling it ‘cached-channel-instance’ (or similar; as a
rule of thumb, I try to avoid “guix” in identifiers as well as
neologisms), and (2) not opening a connection to the daemon? :-)
As it stands, this procedure opens a connection unconditionally anyway,
so it’s fine IMO to just move that ‘with-store’ to time-machine.scm and
to ‘inferior-for-channels’.
I also think it would be preferable to make it a separate patch
(separate from the one that adds time-machine.scm), if it’s OK for you.
Thoughts?
Thank you!
Ludo’.
[bug#37978] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix time-machine", Ludovic Courtès, 2019/11/08