[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#38115] [PATCH] gnu: Add dpf-plugins.
From: |
Marius Bakke |
Subject: |
[bug#38115] [PATCH] gnu: Add dpf-plugins. |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Nov 2019 23:45:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.29.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Alexandros Theodotou <address@hidden> writes:
> From aebc4cded75e51f6c453a52cae10c9224d9e7df9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alexandros Theodotou <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 08:55:22 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add dpf-plugins.
>
> * gnu/packages/music.scm: (dpf-plugins): New variable.
[...]
> + (arguments
> + `(#:tests? #f ; no "check" target
> + #:make-flags
> + (list (string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs "out")))
> + #:phases
> + (modify-phases %standard-phases
> + (add-after 'unpack 'skip-dssi-binaries
> + (lambda _
> + (substitute* "Makefile"
> + (("cp -r bin.*-dssi.*$") ":;\n"))
> + #t))
Can you expand on this comment? What are these binaries, and why do we
need to prevent them from being installed?
> + (license `(license:isc license:gpl3 license:lgpl3 license:mit
> license:gpl2))))
Does this work? I would expect each of the license entries to have to
be 'unquoted', i.e. `(,license:isc). Alternatively you can use (list
...) here.
When a package has multiple licenses like here, please add a comment
about it. Is there a "main" license, (roughly) which files are under
what license?
Apart from that LGTM.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature