On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 09:53:48PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
I like the approach of Tobias' proposed patch, but to avoid losing
information (most of the hash), how about changing:
(string-append store (string-take hash 8) "…")
to something like:
(string-append store (string-take hash 2) "." (string-drop hash
2))
What do you think? Anyway, I don't feel strongly about it, and I
acknowledge that neither approach is perfect.
I feel like the unicode character "…" makes it much more clear that
the
path has been modified, but it's a moot point considering that if
someone might get confused by this, they probably won't be able to
make
use of the hash.
However, now that I come back to this after some time, I realize that
there is another solution:
(string-append store (string-take hash 8) "<span></span>"
(string-drop hash 8))
This would neuter the reference without having any user-visible
impact on
about:buildconfig. What do you think?