[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#39762: [PATCH] gnu: cpuid: Update to 20200211.
From: |
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice |
Subject: |
bug#39762: [PATCH] gnu: cpuid: Update to 20200211. |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:49:52 +0100 |
Vincent,
Thanks for the update! I only recently (this year?) learnt of
this readable alternative to /proc/cpuinfo. Glad to hear it's
seeing more action.
Vincent Legoll 写道:
But in normal mode, output changed a lot, some separators
changed from ":"
to "="
This was deliberate, for consistency:
Wed Feb 5 2020 Todd Allen <address@hidden>
* cpuid.c: Changed mp_synth fields to use '=' separator
instead of ':',
like every other value.
* cpuid.c: Changed processor serial number to use '='
separator instead
of ':', like every other value.
a lot of reported values, new things... This will probably break
any simplistic parsing of that output, if there is anything
doing that in
guix...
No:
~ λ guix refresh -l cpuid
No dependents other than itself: cpuid@20200116
It's possible there's something out there calling cpuid from
$PATH, but…
Guixers, please advise how to proceed further.
…honestly, you're overthinking it. :-) There's a time to be
cautious but bumping cpuid is probably not it.
Guix is exceptionally good at installing previous versions of
packages for those who disagree. I've pushed your patch as
08fee94d0fd96ea2b40f9fec80dc3fa19e283019.
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: cpuid: Update to 20200211. *
gnu/packages/linux.scm
(cpuid): Update to 20200211.
Note that git expects an empty line (newline) between the commit
summary and the body of the message:
gnu: cpuid: Update to 20200211.
* gnu/packages/linux.scm (cpuid): Update to 20200211.
Thanks again,
T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature