[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4
From: |
Maxim Cournoyer |
Subject: |
[bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition. |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Apr 2020 22:20:53 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hi!
Pierre Neidhardt <address@hidden> writes:
> Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:39:18AM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
>>> > So compression saves me 26% ([69-51]/69), and deduplication saves me
>>> > 62% ([180-69]/180).
>>>
>>> Thanks for sharing!
>>> zstd might give better results. Any reason you chose lzo over zstd?
>>>
>>
>> My machine is about 10 years old so I was more concerned than normal
>> about the CPU usage. If lz4 was an option I would've gone with that, but
>> according to the Arch wiki or some other locations lzo was basically the
>> fastest option.
>
> I've tried zstd on an AMD Athlon II X4 635 (2010): it's perfectly
> smooth, can't notice any performance drop. In fact, I wonder if it's
> not even faster than before, but it's hard to measure.
I've also tried zstd (default level, 3) on a Intel Q6700 desktop (2007).
I don't see any CPU spike caused by the compression. It's operating
quite smoothly actually, and gives me the following space savings:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
sudo compsize -x /gnu/store
Processed 1613194 files, 402674 regular extents (1163093 refs), 665696 inline.
Type Perc Disk Usage Uncompressed Referenced
TOTAL 60% 15G 25G 63G
none 100% 10G 10G 28G
zstd 33% 5.1G 15G 34G
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Recently on the #btrfs channel someone suggested to use the Btrfs option
compress-force=zstd rather than compress=zstd, the reason being that
zstd has its own algorithm to determine if it should compress a file or
not, and that this is faster than what Btrfs does on its own when trying
to test for compressibility.
Another suggestion was to use space_cache=v2 (it defaults to v1). This
is supposedly more efficient at managing the free space pool on large
drives (TB and up).
Maxim
- [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition., (continued)
- [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition., Jonathan Brielmaier, 2020/04/02
- [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition., Maxim Cournoyer, 2020/04/03
- [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition., Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/04/06
- [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition., Jonathan Brielmaier, 2020/04/06
- [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition., Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/04/07
- [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition., Maxim Cournoyer, 2020/04/07
- [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition., Efraim Flashner, 2020/04/09
- [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition., Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/04/10
- [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition., Efraim Flashner, 2020/04/10
- [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition., Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/04/10
- [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition.,
Maxim Cournoyer <=
- [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition., Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/04/14