[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#42279] [PATCH] gnu: Add distrho-ports.
From: |
Marius Bakke |
Subject: |
[bug#42279] [PATCH] gnu: Add distrho-ports. |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jul 2020 00:59:06 +0200 |
Alexandros Theodotou <alex@zrythm.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 00:07 +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> > + Wolpertinger.")
>> > + (home-page "http://distrho.sourceforge.net/ports")
>> > + (license (list license:gpl2 ; found in doc directory
>> > + license:lgpl3+ ; found in doc directory
>> > + license:gpl3))))) ; mentioned in meson file
>>
>> This is a problem: GPL3 is famously incompatible with GPL2. If these
>> plugins are licensed separately it would be good to list the license
>> for
>> each and take it from there.
>>
>> Even better (I think?) is to package each plugin separately. Then
>> users
>> can choose whether to combine these incompatibly-licensed plugins,
>> but
>> we as a distribution can not (and probably not DISTRHO either).
>>
>> Not sure what to do about it. Ideas?
>
> Why is it a problem? It's only a problem if you link them together
> afaik. The plugins that this project produces are all separate
> binaries, each under its own license.
Right. If they don't share code it's probably okay.
> I think we should just list the license for each included plugin. I'm a
> bit against making separate packages - it would be a pain to maintain
> and the plugins don't take up much disk space.
Listing the license of each plugin sounds good to me.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature