[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#42390] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-mamba.
From: |
Tanguy Le Carrour |
Subject: |
[bug#42390] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-mamba. |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:52:16 +0200 |
Hi,
Le 07/28, Ludovic Courtès a écrit :
> Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy@bioneland.org> skribis:
>
> > The question is now: is it possible to make the warning go away by
> > marking it as being an "exception" in the package definition?
> > Are comments "part of the code" and be used for that? Can we use a
> > different package name (`python-coverage-propagated`) that would not
> > be in the list?
>
> We could use a property, similar to how the ‘lint-hidden-cve’ property
> is handled by the ‘cve’ linter.
Sounds great! … unless you expected me to implement it! ^_^'
I guesse `check-inputs-should-be-native` should look a bit like
`check-vulnerabilities`, but I have no idea how to do that! Sorry!
--
Tanguy
- [bug#42390] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-mamba., Tanguy Le Carrour, 2020/07/16
- bug#42390: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-mamba., Ludovic Courtès, 2020/07/21
- [bug#42390] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-mamba., Tanguy Le Carrour, 2020/07/22
- [bug#42390] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-mamba., Ludovic Courtès, 2020/07/22
- [bug#42390] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-mamba., Hartmut Goebel, 2020/07/23
- [bug#42390] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-mamba., Tanguy Le Carrour, 2020/07/24
- [bug#42390] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-mamba., Ludovic Courtès, 2020/07/24
- [bug#42390] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-mamba., Hartmut Goebel, 2020/07/27
- [bug#42390] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-mamba., Tanguy Le Carrour, 2020/07/27
- [bug#42390] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-mamba., Ludovic Courtès, 2020/07/28
- [bug#42390] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-mamba.,
Tanguy Le Carrour <=
[bug#42390] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-mamba., Tanguy Le Carrour, 2020/07/31