[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#42364] [PATCH v2] gnu: Add python-robber.
From: |
Marius Bakke |
Subject: |
[bug#42364] [PATCH v2] gnu: Add python-robber. |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:23:39 +0200 |
Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy@bioneland.org> writes:
> Hi Marius,
>
>
> Le 07/25, Marius Bakke a écrit :
>> Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy@bioneland.org> writes:
>>
>> > * gnu/packages/python-check.scm (python-robber): New variable.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > + ;; The last version tagged in Github (0.1.0) is older than the one on
>> > PyPI.
>> > + ;; Reported upstream: <https://github.com/vesln/robber.py/issues/20>.
>>
>> Wow, it's concerning that someone just uploaded a fork on PyPI without
>> notifying the original author, yet reuses the original home page.
>
> He might have tried, but… the original author's email address given on
> PyPI does not exist any more!
Oh, right. That makes sense. :-)
>> Even more so when there are no tags matching the uploaded tarball.
>>
>> I think we should adjust the home page of this package to point to the
>> fork, and maybe add a comment explaining the situation. WDYT?
>
> I've just send a email to the author of the last commit in the second
> repo. Let's see what will happen!
> In the worst case scenario, I can open a claim request on PyPI and fix
> the mess myself. But let's hope I don't have to do that! ^_^'
I hope so too! Meanwhile I think we can take the original patch you
sent, but adjust the home page to that of the fork.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature