guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#45721] Telegram Desktop (v25)


From: Raghav Gururajan
Subject: [bug#45721] Telegram Desktop (v25)
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 14:30:22 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/78.6.1

Hi Leo!

+  (let ((commit "cbd43984ebdf783e94c8303c41385bf82aa36d5b")
+        (revision "12"))
+    (hidden-package
+     (package
+       (inherit rlottie)
+       (version
+        (git-version "0.2" revision commit))
According to Github, Telegram's rlottie is 19 commits ahead and 193
commits behind Samsung's rlottie, whereas Samsung has had 34
commits to
master since the release of 0.2.  In other words, this should still
be
0.1, and I'm not too sure about revision 12.

The desktop-app/rlottie forked samsung/rlottie at a commit
corresponding
to v0.2. After forking, desktop-app/rlottie made 19 commits. The
12th
commit is what the package is what this package is building from.
Hence
the revision number 12.
That timeline makes little sense.  The v0.2 release was on August 19th
2020, but the two libraries diverge on August 7th -- again according to
Github.  The files also indicate 0.1.

+    (name "telegram-desktop")
+    (version "2.5.8")
Any news w.r.t. tdesktop#10182 in this build?

Nope! :-(

But build fails w.r.t updated version of tg_owt. I'll have to send
v26.
I don't think building static libraries is very guixy.  If 2.5.8 is no
significant improvement over 2.5.1 in that regard, let's stay with the
latter while we can still build shared libraries.

Agreed. I have sent v27.

Regards,
RG.

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x5F5816647F8BE551.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]