[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#47086] [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3.
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
[bug#47086] [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:27:54 +0100 |
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 11:42, "jgart" <jgart@dismail.de> wrote:
>> Is LibreMiami a person or a «juridical person»?
> Yes, LibreMiami is a juridical person. We are a legal entity that
> commits and works on packaging software together.
Thanks for the clarification. I still think it is a bad idea that
LibreMiami holds the Copyright instead of people who effectively did the
work. That’s my point of view.
>> It is also the case for 387cac30bc4161055aba0c51e798a440f44592c2 adding
>> the package ’t’ (then renamed) and ...
>
> #46969 and go-github-com-operatorfoundation-ed25519
> (a2ece4da1fdccb9e94681e38a3f3a79b0d43e061) are other examples too.
If I read correctly, this commit a2ece4 does not lead to a Copyright
assignment. So it’s fine. Even, I find really cool that 6 people
co-authored a patch during a meetup.
> We host a package meetup every month. If you're available, we'd love
> to meet you and work on something together, also.
This is really cool! Great initiative. Maybe I will show up. :-)
My point is just about the holder of the Copyright. Concretely, to be
correct legally speaking, IIUC, the co-authors (of the 2 commits and
this patch) signed a copyright transfer to the LibreMiami entity.
Otherwise, the copyright does not belong to LibreMiami.
Cheers,
simon
- [bug#47086] [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3., jgart, 2021/03/12
- [bug#47086] [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3., zimoun, 2021/03/12
- [bug#47086] [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3., jgart, 2021/03/12
- bug#47086: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3., Ludovic Courtès, 2021/03/17
- [bug#47086] [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3., jgart, 2021/03/17
- [bug#47086] [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3., jgart, 2021/03/17