Hello!
Luis Felipe <luis.felipe.la@protonmail.com> skribis:
On Friday, May 28, 2021 11:06 AM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
I see that you want to keep it open to non-academic publications, which
is a good idea. I wonder if there should be a visual distinction
between peer-reviewed scientific articles, journal articles, and other
types of publications?
[...]
From ef4e97ec9a49e65d70c9ba8d4c1926b2eeec2cba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luis Felipe <luis.felipe.la@protonmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:17:03 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] website: publications: Add publication type.
* website/apps/media/types.scm (<publication>): Add "type" field.
* website/apps/media/data.scm (publications): Specify publication types.
* website/apps/media/templates/components.scm (publication->shtml): Show
publication type.
Pushed, thanks!
Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu> skribis:
The patch looks good, but how would people out of science understand what's a conference paper, or the difference between an article and a journal article? Are there better terms?
I was wondering whether we should just distinguish between “scientific
papers” (peer-reviewed, be it conference papers, journals, or book
chapters) and other publications.
Perhaps a visual cue for scientific publications, such as an English
graduate cap, would be enough?
Ludo’.