[bug#49076] [PATCH] gnu: dune-bootstrap: Update to 2.8.5.

[pukkamustard]

Hi,

I can confirm that `ocaml-mdx` is currently not building for me 
locally.
It seems to be that something in the dune 2.8 format changed and 
was breaking tests. This was fixed in ocaml-mdx 
(https://github.com/realworldocaml/mdx/pull/314) which is in 
ocaml-mdx 0.8. Simply updating ocaml-mdx to 0.9 (the latest) makes 
ocaml-mdx build again. Patch for that is attached.

0001-gnu-Update-ocaml-mdx-to-1.9.0.patch
Description: Text Data

I don't yet understand what was changed in the dune format that 
caused this break and if that also affects other packages.
-pukkamustard


Xinglu Chen <public@yoctocell.xyz> writes:

> On Fri, Jun 18 2021, Julien Lepiller wrote:
>
> > Oops, didn't send to tre right address. Pushed to master, 
> > thanks.
> Great!
>
> I see that CI is not able to build some packages, but I tried 
> building
> them locally and it worked fine.  Excerpt from 
> <cuirass@gnu.org>:
> --8<---------------cut 
> here---------------start------------->8---
> Build ocaml-integers.x86_64-linux on master is broken.
> Build ocaml4.09-dune-configurator.aarch64-linux on master is 
> broken.
> Build ocaml-cppo.x86_64-linux on master is broken.
> Build ocaml-syntax-shims.x86_64-linux on master is broken.
> Build r-mbkmeans.i686-linux on master is broken.
> Build ocaml-version.x86_64-linux on master is broken.
> Build ocaml-ppx-derivers.x86_64-linux on master is broken.
> Build ocaml-cairo2.x86_64-linux on master is broken.
> Build r-rhdf5filters.i686-linux on master is broken.
> Build ocaml-mmap.x86_64-linux on master is broken.
> Build r-xbioc.x86_64-linux on master is fixed.
> Build ocaml-num.x86_64-linux on master is broken.
> Build ocaml-graphics.x86_64-linux on master is broken.
> Build ocaml-csv.x86_64-linux on master is broken.
> Build r-do-db.x86_64-linux on master is fixed.
> Build r-biomart.x86_64-linux on master is fixed.
> Build ocaml-camomile.x86_64-linux on master is broken.
> --8<---------------cut 
> here---------------end--------------->8---
> Any ideas?