[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#49329] [PATCH 1/4] gnu: python2-renpy: Drop unused Ren'py sources.
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
[bug#49329] [PATCH 1/4] gnu: python2-renpy: Drop unused Ren'py sources. |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Jul 2021 10:28:05 +0200 |
Hi Leo,
On Sat, 03 Jul 2021 at 10:35, Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> wrote:
> I must admit, I haven't been following the Python 2 removal plan too
> closely. Is it already time to move working leaf packages?
The Python EOL is January, 1rst 2020 [1]. So now, we are 1.5 years
ahead, so yes it seems already time to cook a plan. :-)
However, there is no consensus about such plan. ;-) Some related
discussions:
2018-12: <https://yhetil.org/guix/20181226093812.GR2581@macbook41/>
2019-10:
<https://yhetil.org/guix/CAJ3okZ33HsXxgVgK3XyVHvYUfDUrbcwBnOn7FC6=3AG_YvAUbQ@mail.gmail.com/>
2019-11: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/38420> Failed attempt to cook
something
2021-01: <https://yhetil.org/guix/86pn1pgf7z.fsf@gmail.com/>
>From my understanding, the “implemented” plan is described by Maxim
here:
<https://yhetil.org/guix/87pn1oxv0m.fsf@gmail.com/>
I just want to point that it is less work to transfer a functional and
supported by upstream package than to transfer a package starting to
have issues. Other said, I think it is easier to find motivation to do
the transfer for this previous case than to do some “janitor” work
later. For what my opinion is worth. :-)
About Ren’Py 7, I do not have an opinion. Yeah, waiting Ren’Py 8 seems
The Right Thing™ to do. :-)
Hope that helps,
simon
1: <https://www.python.org/doc/sunset-python-2/>
[bug#49329] [PATCH v2 1/5] gnu: python2-renpy: Drop unused Ren'py sources., Leo Prikler, 2021/07/03
[bug#49329] [PATCH v2 4/5] gnu: renpy: Correct inputs., Leo Prikler, 2021/07/03