[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#50343] [PATCH] gnu: Add linux-libre 5.14.
From: |
Pierre Langlois |
Subject: |
[bug#50343] [PATCH] gnu: Add linux-libre 5.14. |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Sep 2021 12:56:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.6.5; emacs 27.2 |
Hi Leo,
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (linux-libre-5.14-version, deblob-scripts-5.14,
> linux-libre-5.14-pristine-source, linux-libre-5.14-source,
> linux-libre-headers-5.14, linux-libre-5.14): New variables.
> * gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.14-arm.conf,
> gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.14-arm64.conf,
> gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.14-i686.conf,
> gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.14-x86_64.conf: New files.
I just tried out 5.14.2 on my rockpro64 (rk3399 chip) and ethernet isn't
working :-/. It probably also affects the pinebook pro.
Doing a bit of searching, I see it was reported upstream and this patch
introduced the issue
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20210823143754.14294-1-michael.riesch@wolfvision.net/
I see Manjaro has patched their kernel to revert the patch as well:
https://gitlab.manjaro.org/manjaro-arm/packages/core/linux/-/commit/5e87e6f3b764d64bbb5b183e379a5fe64c3646ad
I suppose we could also apply that patch, although I'm sure it'll get
fixed upstream in a point release. We probably don't want to delay the 5.14
switch too much, maybe we could keep the linux-libre-5.13 variable
around for a little longer though? If not, I'm sure I could just use
5.10 though.
Just thought I'd report it!
Thanks for the update,
Pierre
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature