[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#52066] [PATCH, core-updates-frozen, RFC] Fix static guile on aarch6
From: |
Pierre Langlois |
Subject: |
[bug#52066] [PATCH, core-updates-frozen, RFC] Fix static guile on aarch64 |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Nov 2021 21:22:31 +0000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 27.2 |
Hi Guix!
With the recent call for testing on core-updates-frozen I thought I'd
test my router configuration on the RockPro64 and I saw that building
the stripped static guile for initrd didn't build. I found a fix but
I'm not 100% sure it's correct, so beware, here's my debugging session!
%guile-static-stripped fails to build as such:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ ./pre-inst-env guix build -e '(@ (gnu packages make-bootstrap)
%guile-static-stripped)'
...
Backtrace:
1 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/gz31w23fjaipnm9c9hzw6p8s619?")
In guix/build/utils.scm:
761:6 0 (invoke "/gnu/store/9rwp8z98xdllih5rzf2ncq25xhnkgcvq-g?" ?)
guix/build/utils.scm:761:6: In procedure invoke:
ERROR:
1. &invoke-error:
program:
"/gnu/store/9rwp8z98xdllih5rzf2ncq25xhnkgcvq-guile-static-stripped-3.0.7/bin/guile"
arguments: ("--version")
exit-status: 127
term-signal: #f
stop-signal: #f
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
The stripped guile crashes, and if we check it, it's actually not a
static binary! So when stripping out store references we break it of
course:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ file
/gnu/store/9rwp8z98xdllih5rzf2ncq25xhnkgcvq-guile-static-stripped-3.0.7/bin/guile
/gnu/store/9rwp8z98xdllih5rzf2ncq25xhnkgcvq-guile-static-stripped-3.0.7/bin/guile:
ELF 64-bit LSB executable, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV),
dynamically linked, interpreter
/gnu/store/eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee-glibc-2.33/lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1,
for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, stripped
^^^^^^^^
Oups :-)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
The root of the issue seems to be that the make-guile-static procedure
isn't actually producing a static binary on aarch64. Digging into it
more, we do pass the -all-static flag to libtool, but the gcc command
doesn't actually do any static linking:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
/tmp/guix-build-guile-static-3.0.7.drv-0/guile-3.0.7$ make V=1
...
../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -std=gnu11 -pthread -Wall
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv
-fvisibility=hidden -g -O2 -all-static -pthread -ldl -o guile guile-guile.o
libguile-3.0.la -ldl -lcrypt -lm
libtool: link: gcc -std=gnu11 -pthread -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wpointer-arith -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fvisibility=hidden -g -O2
-pthread -o guile guile-guile.o ./.libs/libguile-3.0.a
-L/gnu/store/3539zsmc939g1r9g3r02bpy0m1b9v9c8-libgc-8.0.4/lib
-L/gnu/store/sn95w7yk9qwxhw74l590606y53pf5mkf-libffi-3.3/lib
/gnu/store/3539zsmc939g1r9g3r02bpy0m1b9v9c8-libgc-8.0.4/lib/libgc.a -lpthread
/gnu/store/sn95w7yk9qwxhw74l590606y53pf5mkf-libffi-3.3/lib/libffi.a -lunistring
-ldl -lcrypt -lm -pthread
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
And if we try and do a static link anyway, it doens't work because of
missing references related to atomic ops. My guess is that libtool tried
to statically link, and fell back to dynamic linking when that didn't
work, I'm not so sure.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
/tmp/guix-build-guile-static-3.0.7.drv-0/guile-3.0.7/libguile$ gcc -std=gnu11
-pthread -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -fno-strict-aliasing
-fwrapv -fvisibility=hidden -g -O2 -pthread -o guile guile-guile.o
./.libs/libguile-3.0.a -L/gnu/store/3539zsmc939g1
r9g3r02bpy0m1b9v9c8-libgc-8.0.4/lib
-L/gnu/store/sn95w7yk9qwxhw74l590606y53pf5mkf-libffi-3.3/lib
/gnu/store/3539zsmc939g1r9g3r02bpy0m1b9v9c8-libgc-8.0.4/lib/libgc.a -lpthread
/gnu/store/sn95w7yk9qwxhw74l590606y53pf5mkf-libffi-3.3/lib/libffi.a -lunistring
-ldl -lcrypt -lm -p
thread -static
ld: ./.libs/libguile-3.0.a(libguile_3.0_la-dynl.o): in function `scm_dlopen':
/tmp/guix-build-guile-static-3.0.7.drv-0/guile-3.0.7/libguile/dynl.c:78:
warning: Using 'dlopen' in statically linked applications requires at runtime
the shared libraries from the glibc version used for linking
ld: ./.libs/libguile-3.0.a(libguile_3.0_la-posix.o): in function `scm_tmpnam':
/tmp/guix-build-guile-static-3.0.7.drv-0/guile-3.0.7/libguile/posix.c:1611:
warning: the use of `tmpnam' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'
ld:
/gnu/store/b05hb686wamq78d5jzpisns9xdx6nkp2-glibc-2.33-static/lib/libc.a(abort.o):
in function `abort':
(.text.unlikely+0x34): undefined reference to `__aarch64_cas4_acq'
ld: (.text.unlikely+0xa0): undefined reference to `__aarch64_swp4_rel'
ld: (.text.unlikely+0xe4): undefined reference to `__aarch64_cas4_acq'
ld:
/gnu/store/b05hb686wamq78d5jzpisns9xdx6nkp2-glibc-2.33-static/lib/libpthread.a(pthread_create.o):(.text+0x5c):
undefined reference to `__aarch64_cas4_acq'
ld:
/gnu/store/b05hb686wamq78d5jzpisns9xdx6nkp2-glibc-2.33-static/lib/libpthread.a(pthread_create.o):(.text+0x1fc):
undefined reference to `__aarch64_cas4_acq'
ld:
/gnu/store/b05hb686wamq78d5jzpisns9xdx6nkp2-glibc-2.33-static/lib/libpthread.a(pthread_create.o):(.text+0x29c):
undefined reference to `__aarch64_cas4_acq'
...
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Doing more digging, I found a reference to a similar issue here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830472#c1, this looks
related to the -moutline-atomics option that's enabled by default with
GCC 10. But we're building guile with GCC 7 so it was a bit confusing.
However, glibc here is actually built with the default GCC 10, and if we
change that then it works!
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
--- a/gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm
@@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ (define glibc-for-bootstrap
`(cons* "--disable-nscd" "--disable-build-nscd"
"--enable-static-nss"
,flags))))
+ (native-inputs
+ `(("gcc" ,gcc-7)
+ ,@(package-native-inputs base)))
;; Remove the 'debug' output to allow bit-reproducible builds (when the
;; 'debug' output is used, ELF files end up with a .gnu_debuglink, which
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I'm not 100% sure what's going on, there seems to be an incompatiblity
between GCC 7 and 10, but I don't know if this is a bug or if it's
working as intended. I have a feeling statically linking the libc with
different compiler version might just not be supported, but it works in
practise a lot of the time.
Does this make sense? Do you think the following patch would be the
right way to fix this?
Thanks!
Pierre
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
From c1f61c161b3f5f7e8430c4925b0785d3819e255e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois@gmx.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 22:41:20 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: glibc-for-bootstrap: Build with GCC 7.
* gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm (glibc-for-bootstrap)[native-inputs]:
Add gcc-7.
---
gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm b/gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm
index 267adde48c..d8f1f0eb1e 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm
@@ -86,6 +86,12 @@ (define glibc-for-bootstrap
"--enable-static-nss"
,flags))))
+ ;; Make sure to build glibc with the same compiler version with the rest
+ ;; of the bootstrap. Otherwise it fails to statically link on aarch64.
+ (native-inputs
+ `(("gcc" ,gcc-7)
+ ,@(package-native-inputs base)))
+
;; Remove the 'debug' output to allow bit-reproducible builds (when the
;; 'debug' output is used, ELF files end up with a .gnu_debuglink, which
;; includes a CRC of the corresponding debugging symbols; those symbols
--
2.34.0
- [bug#52066] [PATCH, core-updates-frozen, RFC] Fix static guile on aarch64,
Pierre Langlois <=