[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#54986] [PATCH v2 3/3 WIP] services: mpd: Support socket activation.
From: |
Liliana Marie Prikler |
Subject: |
[bug#54986] [PATCH v2 3/3 WIP] services: mpd: Support socket activation. |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Apr 2022 20:28:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.42.1 |
Am Samstag, dem 23.04.2022 um 19:35 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op za 23-04-2022 om 16:39 [+0200]:
> > +@item @code{shepherd-endpoints} (default: @code{'()})
> > +The endpoints shepherd shall bind and spawn MPD from. If this
> > field is
> > +not empty (checked via @code{null?}), a systemd-style service is
> > used
> > +rather than a forkexec-service.
>
> systemd-style / forkexec-service looks like an implementation detail
> to me, not something useful to the user.
>
> > This delays the start of MPD until the
> > +first client connects.
>
> Likewise.
Even if this was just an implementation detail, I shall point to
Hyrum's law.
> > As a side effect @code{port} and @code{address}
> > +may be ignored.
>
> Could these three fields be unified, keeping 'port' and 'address'
> only for some backwards compatibility? E.g.:
>
> (mpd-configuration
> (endpoints (list (shepherd-endpoint [a AF_INET6 address])
> (shepherd-endpoint [a AF_UNIX address]))))
Not AFAIK. MPD is less strict than Guile when it comes to addresses,
so converting from address+port to socket addresses is nontrivial.
That being said, I'm not sure if they are even ignored. MPD only warns
about pid_file, so they might also be used.
Cheers
- [bug#54986] [PATCH] gnu: mpd: Add support for socket activation., (continued)
[bug#54986] [PATCH v2 1/3] gnu: mpd: Add support for socket activation., Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/04/23
[bug#54986] [PATCH v2 3/3 WIP] services: mpd: Support socket activation., Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/04/23
[bug#54986] [PATCH v2 2/3 WIP] services: shepherd: Add support for socket activation endpoints., Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/04/23