[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#54832] Fwd: Re: [bug#54832] [patch] update glibc to 2.35
From: |
zamfofex |
Subject: |
[bug#54832] Fwd: Re: [bug#54832] [patch] update glibc to 2.35 |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Apr 2022 11:19:26 -0300 (BRT) |
> Why are empty static libraries skipped? Would "gcc -static -lpthread main.c"
> (*)
> (in an environment that includes glibc:static) still work, or does it now
> fail?
They are skipped from being moved, but then should be copied in the loop
immediately below it.
> An explanation and a link to an upstream report is mising.
> (apparently upstream=Guix here?).
I’m not sure if there is a report yet. There is a conversation in IRC, however.
See:
- <https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2022-04-09.log#081848>
- <https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2022-04-09.log#082442>
- <https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2022-04-09.log#171259>
- <https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2022-04-09.log#174339>
> What's the reason for this patch?
‘/bin/sh’ doesn’t seem available in the build environment, so tests were
failing. From what I was able to see, that macro is only used in tests, so I
didn’t think it would be worthwhile to make it refer to ‘/gnu/store/.../bash’.
- - - - - - -
Apologies to Maxime for the repeated messages, and to others for taking so long
to reply. Apparently I hadn’t replied to the debbugs address, so my initial
messages were sent only to Maxime.
I hope this can be looked into soon enough!