guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#56766] [PATCH] gnu: exiv2: Fix test failure on ppc64-le


From: Maxime Devos
Subject: [bug#56766] [PATCH] gnu: exiv2: Fix test failure on ppc64-le
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 21:11:16 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0

1. Inform upstream that the test (or the code it tests) is broken on
   ppc64le, such that a better test can be devised and everyone    (not
   only Guix) benefits,

This has been done. Their reply, in short: ppc64 is not on their supported platforms list and they delegate the fix to others.
OK, in that case ...

On 25-07-2022 21:47, Marcel van der Boom wrote:
+--- /tests/bugfixes/github/test_CVE_2018_12265.py
++++ /tests/bugfixes/github/test_CVE_2018_12265.py
+@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
+ Warning: Directory Image, entry 0x0201: Strip 0 is outside of the data area; ignored.
+ Warning: Directory Image, entry 0x0201: Strip 7 is outside of the data area; ignored.
+ Error: Offset of directory Thumbnail, entry 0x0201 is out of bounds: Offset = 0x00000000; truncating the entry
+-$uncaught_exception $addition_overflow_message
+ """
+     ]
+-    retval = [1]
++    retval = [0]

... this is your proposed fix for powerpc64le, but how do we know whether it is correct? Is this just rewriting the test until it passes, hiding the underlying overflow bug which even had an CVE so probably pretty important to not hide it and actually fix it, or do we know for a fact that on ppc64le, a retval = [0] is correct?

Maybe this is answered by:

ppc64 and arm do not raise exception and thus output and exit code for test is different.
but I don't know if that's working around symptoms or addressing the cause, e.g. https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues/933#issuecomment-863333032 noticed something on offsets -- summarised, this is not a sufficiently convincing explanation for me.

Also, somehow this version of the package builds on Debian sid, so maybe Debian knows more, though I'm not finding anything relevant in the Debian package myself.

Greetings,
Maxime.

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]