[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#59520] [PATCH] doc: Note that ‘guix package’ accepts file names.
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
[bug#59520] [PATCH] doc: Note that ‘guix package’ accepts file names. |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:08:19 +0100 |
Hi Tobias,
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 at 01:10, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches via
<guix-patches@gnu.org> wrote:
> Quoting the word feature sounds very sarcastic. Is that just
> because you don't personally use it?
Sorry, sarcastic was not what I mean. Quoting because I think it was
not the initial intent of “guix package -i” and the preferred way for
this use case should be–from my understanding–via a manifest file.
So I consider (considered?) that more as a bug than a feature. Well,
the quoting was not sarcasm but surprise, as in «ah? that’s not a bug…
hm ok, it is a feature». :-)
Cheers,
simon
- [bug#59520] [PATCH] doc: Note that guix package can operate on outputs., (continued)
- [bug#59520] [PATCH] doc: Note that ‘guix package’ accepts file names., Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2022/11/23
- bug#59520: [PATCH] doc: Note that ‘guix package’ accepts file names., Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2022/11/23
- [bug#59520] [PATCH] doc: Note that ‘guix package’ accepts file names., zimoun, 2022/11/23
- [bug#59520] [PATCH] doc: Note that ‘guix package’ accepts file names., Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2022/11/23
- [bug#59520] [PATCH] doc: Note that ‘guix package’ accepts file names., Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2022/11/23
- [bug#59520] [PATCH] doc: Note that ‘guix package’ accepts file names.,
zimoun <=