guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#50892] bug#59781: [version 1.4.0rc1] install.sh script should autho


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: [bug#50892] bug#59781: [version 1.4.0rc1] install.sh script should authorize bordeaux
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 10:09:58 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)

Hi,

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> skribis:

> (Ugh, this patch is so ugly, all to work around that triplication in
> ~/.config/guix/current/share/guix/*.pub…  Would it be OK for ‘guix
> archive --authorize’ to silently ignore duplicate keys?)

Oh, good point.  I guess we could change ‘public-keys->acl’ to
deduplicate entries.  Maybe something along these lines:

diff --git a/guix/pki.scm b/guix/pki.scm
index 6326e065e9..c5b2fb9634 100644
--- a/guix/pki.scm
+++ b/guix/pki.scm
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
-;;; Copyright © 2013, 2014, 2016 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
+;;; Copyright © 2013, 2014, 2016, 2022 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
 ;;;
 ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
 ;;;
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ (define-module (guix pki)
   #:use-module (gcrypt pk-crypto)
   #:use-module ((guix utils) #:select (with-atomic-file-output))
   #:use-module ((guix build utils) #:select (mkdir-p))
+  #:autoload   (srfi srfi-1) (delete-duplicates)
   #:use-module (ice-9 match)
   #:use-module (ice-9 rdelim)
   #:use-module (ice-9 binary-ports)
@@ -61,9 +62,10 @@ (define (public-keys->acl keys)
   ;; want to have name certificates and to use subject names instead of
   ;; complete keys.
   `(acl ,@(map (lambda (key)
-                 `(entry ,(canonical-sexp->sexp key)
+                 `(entry ,key
                          (tag (guix import))))
-               keys)))
+               (delete-duplicates
+                (map canonical-sexp->sexp keys)))))
 
 (define %acl-file
   (string-append %config-directory "/acl"))
WDYT?

Ludo’.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]