[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#59829] [PATCH core-updates] gnu: wlroots: Add propagated input xcb-
From: |
Simon Tournier |
Subject: |
[bug#59829] [PATCH core-updates] gnu: wlroots: Add propagated input xcb-util-renderutil |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jan 2023 11:20:54 +0100 |
Hi,
On ven., 06 janv. 2023 at 23:13, Andy Tai <lichengtai@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, I thought propagation inputs are for letting dependent packages to be
> able to automatically add this input to its dependency list, like, say,
> glib as a propagation input for gtk+ as all gtk+ [programs has glib as an
> input or dependency. xcb-util-renderutil seems to have a similar role for
> wlroots.
The manual [1] reads for propagated-inputs:
Lastly, propagated-inputs is similar to inputs, but the
specified packages will be automatically installed to profiles
(see the role of profiles in Guix) alongside the package they
belong to (see guix package, for information on how guix package
deals with propagated inputs).
For example this is necessary when packaging a C/C++ library
that needs headers of another library to compile, or when a
pkg-config file refers to another one via its Requires field.
Another example where propagated-inputs is useful is for
languages that lack a facility to record the run-time search
path akin to the RUNPATH of ELF files; this includes Guile,
Python, Perl, and more. When packaging libraries written in
those languages, ensure they can find library code they depend
on at run time by listing run-time dependencies in
propagated-inputs rather than inputs.
Other said, a dependency is added to the propagated-inputs list when
Guix is not able to automatically determine if the package references a
dependency from the inputs list.
My naive question is: is xcb-util-renderutil required by wlroots to
correctly run?
1:
<https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/guix.html#package_002dpropagated_002dinputs>
Cheers,
simon