[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#54986] [PATCH] gnu: mpd: Add support for socket activation.
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
[bug#54986] [PATCH] gnu: mpd: Add support for socket activation. |
Date: |
Thu, 11 May 2023 12:52:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> skribis:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 10.05.2023 um 17:14 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>> > Am Mittwoch, dem 03.05.2023 um 15:27 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> > > It’s not just possible: several services in (gnu services …) and
>> > > (gnu home services …) use endpoints for systemd or inetd-style
>> > > startup.
>> > True, but to my knowledge they don't yet allow the user to specify
>> > those endpoints directly. At the very least, they didn't when I
>> > started this thread, which was shortly after shepherd itself gained
>> > endpoints. I'm happy to be proven wrong on this point.
>>
>> They don’t let users specify the endpoints as such, but closely
>> enough. For instance, the ‘interface’ field of <bitlbee-
>> configuration> is used to build it endpoint, and similarly for
>> ‘openssh’ and ‘dicod’.
>>
>> Overall, it seems to me we don’t need a first-class <endpoint> type
>> in Guix System itself.
> It's funny you would argue that, because imho openssh would actually be
> a good candidate for supporting first-class endpoints: Doing so would
> allow the user to specify whether IPv4, IPv6 or both (default) should
> be allowed for connections. For other service that support sockets as
> well as TCP/IP ports, the benefit would be even greater.
For the services I mentioned, I don’t feel that lack of first-class
endpoints is a hindrance in terms of flexibility. We’re trading
expressivity for ease of use.
> I understand that copypasting all the fields into Guix records is a bit
> of a non-starter, but I don't think it's a good idea to simply give up.
> I just need some pointers in which direction to continue.
Like I wrote, I’m kinda skeptical about the idea. :-)
Now, if you find good motivating examples and find a way to express
endpoints that remain concise in common cases, that may be more
appealing to me!
Ludo’.