[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#63459] Changes to the branching/commit policy
From: |
Maxim Cournoyer |
Subject: |
[bug#63459] Changes to the branching/commit policy |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Jun 2023 21:28:38 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Christopher,
Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> writes:
> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:
>
>> thanks for taking up this issue! I agreed with Ludovic's comments, so
>> things look good now for me. A very minor point: In the section on
>> "trivial" changes, I would drop this sentence (which was already there
>> before):
>> "This is subject to being adjusted, allowing individuals to commit directly
>> on non-controversial changes on parts they’re familiar with."
>> The sentence is meaningless, as everything is all the time subject to being
>> adjusted; and we do not have immediate plans to adjust it.
>
> My reading of this line is that "adjusted" is probably not the right
> word to use, but I think the intent here is to talk about how currently
> it's accepted that people can and will push non-controversial changes on
> parts they’re familiar with directly to master.
>
> I'm not sure if others read this similarly.
That's how I read it as well. I like the ability for people to, at
times depending on the situation, choose to push directly to fix or
update something instead of going through the otherwise recommended 1
week QA/review flow.
--
Thanks,
Maxim